JABbering Stooge

MY COMMENT ABOUT OBAMA ON WALL STREET

• LOL! Epic Logic FAIL! I’m not comparing B. HUSSEIN Osama X The Usurper to a child molester in that infamous tweet, but since he’s just as dangerous to Wall Street as a child molester is to kids, they are comparable in a way. Stupid libtards!

“Shorter” concept created by Daniel Davies, perfected by Elton Beard and given a beneficial mutation by the fine folks at Sadly, No!
I am aware of all Internet tradtions.™

I haven’t seen logic this bad from Boortz since he declared Kerry voters were just as dangerous to America as all Muslims Al-Qaeda.

Just think folks, this moron used to be a lawyer.

Via ThinkProgress:

The Wonk Room reports that the US Forest Service issued and then retracted a Labor Day warning advising hikers to beware of campers in national forests speaking Spanish, drinking Tecate beer, eating tortillas, spam or tuna, and playing Spanish music because “they could be armed marijuana growers.”

Funny, I didn’t know the U. S. Forest Service had hired Neal Boortz.

If you get to insist that Obama purge his administration of 9/11 Truthers (real and imagined), then can we insist that the next Republican president’s administration be free of Birth Certificate Truthers? Or is that different somehow?

According to Gallup (motto: We oversample Republicans so you don’t have to!), Global Warming Denialism is on the rise:

Here’s what Gallup found: The number of Americans who say the media have exaggerated global warming jumped to a record 41 percent in 2009, up from 35 percent a year ago. The most marked increase came among political independents, whose ranks of doubters swelled from 33 percent to 44 percent. Republican doubters grew from 59 percent to 66 percent, while Democratic skeptics stayed at around 20 percent.

So naturally (like stink on shit), Neal Boortz creams his pants at the news:

Recent Gallup polls found that 41% of Americans believe that the media greatly exaggerates global warming.

Yeah, and 44% of Americans believe that The Flintstones is a documentary.

In which Yuval Levin learns not to assume, because it makes an ASS out of U and ME:

All sides in the contemporary debate are trying to find a way to provide health insurance to more people more efficiently and cheaply. They are not divided about any fundamental ethical question. People on the Left are not saying we should provide unlimited medical care to all without thinking about the cost because health care is a right: They’re arguing their approach would cost less and work better for more people. People on the Right are not saying we should forget about the poor because health care is just a privilege: They’re arguing their approach would cost less and work better for more people.

Umm, yeah. About that statement, Mr. Levin…

House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (a moonbat Democrat) is going to introduce a constitutional amendment that would establish healthcare as a “right” for all Americans.

See what I mean?

He says, “We need a real serious bill and, by the way, the fundamental question, ‘Is health care a constitutional right?’ I mean, do you have a right to health care in the American system of government or not?” He goes on to say, “Well, we believe that people do and we’re introducing a constitutional amendment just to make it real clear so that you don’t have to infer or assume that that’s a given and all that.”

This is par for the course for Conyers. He’s a fool … a big government fool. You, however, probably see through this.

Look … it’s this simple. In order for you to receive health care someone else has to either expend time or property. To claim a “right” to health care is to claim a “right” to someone else’s time .. that is, a right to a portion of their life: whatever portion of their life it takes for them to either render the health service or produce the medical implement or drug that is being used. Hate to break this to you … but who in the hell do you think you are to claim a portion of someone else’s life as YOURS? [bolding mine — Ed.]

Yuval Levin, meet Neal Boortz. Neal Boortz, Yuval Levin. I’m sure you’ll get along just swimmingly.

Life just isn’t fair to the Andrei Zhdanov of the Right, Brent Bozell. I mean, the very notion that at any given time someone in the media can disagree with him and still be gainfully employed afterward must really stick in his craw. It’s no wonder then, that he spent last Wednesday riding to the defense of the king of personal attacks, Rush Limbaugh. In his attempt to shield Limbaugh from any criticism whatsoever, he pointed to acerbic comments about Limbaugh from Ed Schultz, Ron Reagan, Jr., Jon Stewart and Mike Malloy as examples of how… wait for it… The LEFT™®© are solely responsible for the coarsening of our public discourse and that only The LEFT™®© could be so hateful.

No, seriously.

Case in point, Neal Boortz, who is using the pirate attack on the Maersk Alabama to drum up hatred against Muslims, complete with putting the word “Muslim” in all caps every time he uses it:

Here’s the scenario. We have some MUSLIM pirates holding an AMERICAN merchant marine captain hostage on a small boat off the coast of the ungoverned country of Somalia. There’s a nuclear powered American guided missile destroyer nearby. A show of weakness … in other words, no action … will encourage the MUSLIM pirates. What do you think Obama will do? Perhaps he’ll be flown out to the destroyer so that he can deliver a symbolic bow to the pirates from the bridge.

By the way … isn’t this what the Navy Seals are for?

Neal Boortz: pro-genocide troll. Seriously. This post has all the maturity of an adolescent haXX0r, and is just as destructive. Now, in the short run, he may be onto something with the SEALs, but in the long run, the problem of piracy off the coast of Somalia won’t be solved by military force alone. We need to find a way to stabilize Somalia so that there’s less incentive to resort to piracy. Naturally, such a rational, nuanced solution is seen as “symbolic dhimmitude” in the eyes of people like Neal “Bomb Muslim countries now, bomb Muslim countries later, bomb Muslim countries some more and then when all the Muslims are dead try to ask a question or two” Boortz.

Just think folks, this asshat used to be a lawyer.

* Cf.

Hey, Jim Bob! Hold my beer and watch this!

Consider this a glimpse into a possible future: an America where gun ownership is mandatory and the most basic of education is only available to the John Thains and Bernie Marcuses and of the world.

You know: Neal Boortz’s wet dream.

Neal Boortz, whining about missed fearmongering opportunities, asks:

How come we never heard about this guy trying to build a dirty bomb in Maine last year?

Perhaps because he was one of your own, Neal.

This has been another edition of Snappy Answers to Stupid Wingnut Questions.

Oh, and the delicious irony of Boortz linking to Raw Story is duly noted. Remember folks, this doofus used to be a lawyer.

Here’s a gem from Neal Boortz’s program notes for today:

The U.N. Secretary-General says that the United States is a “deadbeat” donor. That’s fine. Then stop taking our money.

But Neal, if we’re delinquent in our U.N. dues, they aren’t exactly “taking our money,” are they?

Just think, folks: this chowderhead used to be a lawyer.